AIThis post was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI).

TL;DR

Age 18–24?Offer from Amazon

Prime made for students and young adults

  • Fast, free delivery for dorm and study essentials
  • Prime Video and Amazon Music included
  • Member-only deals
Try Prime for Young Adults Free trial for eligible 18–24 year olds
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

Researchers led by physicist Gerald Gabrielse held a single positron—the antimatter counterpart of an electron—in an electromagnetic trap for a month. The method is intended to support a precise comparison of the positron’s magnetic moment with the electron’s; no new matter–antimatter difference has been reported.

Physicists led by Gerald Gabrielse of Northwestern University reported trapping a single positron—the antimatter counterpart of an electron—for a month, allowing the particle to be isolated for studies of its quantum states. The result, reported in Physical Review Letters, provides a way to pursue a precise comparison of the positron’s magnetic moment with the electron’s, a test of a basic prediction about matter and antimatter.

The apparatus holds the particle without letting it touch a material container. The team used electromagnetic fields to confine the positron in a vacuum cooled to about 0.3 degrees Celsius above absolute zero. Contact with ordinary matter can destroy an antimatter particle through annihilation, so confinement without walls is central to keeping it available for measurement.

To produce positrons, the researchers began with radioactive sodium-22, which emits a positron as it decays. The particles pass through a thin piece of cold tungsten, where interactions with the crystal lattice slow them and drain energy. The positrons that emerge are then guided with electromagnetic fields into the trap. Gabrielse described slowing and capturing the particles as the main challenge, noting that collisions in the tungsten can also result in annihilation.

The month-long hold is a reported capability of the setup, not a completed measurement of a positron’s magnetic moment. The team’s planned measurement requires determining the energy needed to reverse the positron’s spin and the energy needed to move it from its ground state to its first excited state. The researchers say the trap could allow a lone positron to be studied for extended periods, potentially indefinitely; the source does not report a longer completed run.

At a glance
reportWhen: Reported Wednesday in Physical Review L…
The developmentA team reported holding a solitary positron in a trap for a month, a step toward precise measurements of its magnetic properties.

A Test of Matter–Antimatter Symmetry

The immediate scientific value is a route to comparing a positron’s magnetic moment—the strength and orientation of its magnetic field—with the corresponding property of an electron. According to the Standard Model of particle physics, their magnetic moments should be equal in size and opposite in direction. A sufficiently precise measurement could test that prediction.

The comparison also relates to a major open question in cosmology: why the observable universe contains much more matter than antimatter. Scientists think the early universe contained nearly equal amounts of both, which should have largely annihilated. The matter that remained formed the stars, planets and other structures we see. A difference between particles and antiparticles could provide a clue to that imbalance, but this experiment has not found such a difference. It creates a means to investigate one possible sign of it.

The broader importance is therefore prospective. A positron measurement that agrees with the electron result would test a foundational symmetry with greater precision; a discrepancy, if established, would call for close scrutiny and could point toward physics not captured by current theory. The reported trapping result alone does not settle either outcome.

Amazon

introductory particle physics textbook antimatter positrons

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

From Radioactive Sodium to a Wall-Free Trap

Antimatter particles have counterparts in ordinary matter with the same mass and opposite electric charge. A positron has the mass of an electron but a positive charge. When a positron meets an electron or other matter, they can annihilate, making long-term study difficult. Researchers therefore use electric and magnetic fields rather than physical walls to confine charged antimatter particles.

The reported method begins with sodium-22, whose half-life is about two and a half years. Its decay supplies positrons, but those particles initially need to be slowed and directed. Cold tungsten helps remove energy; fields then guide suitable positrons into a vacuum trap. The sequence matters because a particle that strikes ordinary material may be lost before it can be measured.

Gabrielse’s team has previously used a similar trapping approach to measure the electron’s magnetic moment to a precision of one part in 10 trillion, according to the report. The current development is not that same electron result repeated for antimatter: it is the ability to hold an individual positron long enough to pursue the corresponding measurement. The comparison is the next scientific objective.

“The big challenge is to persuade these positrons to slow down and then capture them.”

— Gerald Gabrielse, Northwestern University physicist who oversaw the project

Amazon

quantum physics textbook electron spin magnetic moment

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

The Magnetic-Moment Result Is Pending

The report establishes that the team held a single positron for a month, but it does not provide a new magnetic-moment value or a direct electron–positron comparison. The researchers still need to measure the relevant spin-flip and energy-transition values. No result showing that the particles’ magnetic moments differ is reported.

The source says the approach could permit studies for much longer, potentially indefinitely, but it does not specify a demonstrated maximum trapping time beyond the month-long isolation. It also gives no timetable for the planned positron measurement. Until those measurements are completed and reported, the implications for the matter–antimatter imbalance remain an open research question, not a conclusion of this experiment.

Amazon

electromagnetism textbook charged particle traps Penning trap

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

Precision Measurements Ahead

The team’s stated next goal is to measure the positron’s magnetic moment. Researchers must determine the energy needed to flip its spin and the energy required for a transition from its ground state to its first excited state. Those measurements can then be used to compare the positron with the electron, whose magnetic moment Gabrielse’s group has measured using a similar trap.

The source does not give a schedule for when that comparison will be ready. The next substantive development will be a reported measurement with its precision and comparison to the electron result. Until then, the month-long confinement is an enabling experimental advance, while the symmetry test and any possible connection to the universe’s matter excess remain ahead.

Amazon

physics laboratory vacuum chamber electromagnetic field demonstration kit

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

Key Questions

What particle did the researchers trap?

They trapped a single positron, the antimatter counterpart of an electron, for a month.

How was the positron kept from touching ordinary matter?

Electric and magnetic fields confined it in a vacuum, creating a trap without physical walls. This matters because contact with matter can lead to annihilation.

Did the team find that positrons and electrons have different magnetic moments?

No such finding is reported. The team intends to measure the positron’s magnetic moment and compare it with the electron’s; that measurement is still pending.

Why does the comparison matter?

The Standard Model predicts that the electron and positron magnetic moments should be equal in size and opposite in direction. Testing that prediction may help physicists investigate matter–antimatter symmetry and the unresolved excess of matter in the universe.

Source: hn

HALLOWEEN

Halloween Picks

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

You May Also Like

NASA Asked Several Former SR-71A Staffers To Help Secret Restart

NASA approached former SR-71A test engineers to help return Tail No. 844 to flight after 27 years, Aviation Week reports.

How to Choose Educational Science Kits For Kids

Choose an age-appropriate science kit, set up a safe activity, guide your child through an experiment, and check what they learned.

Rise Of Collagen-eating Microbes May Help Explain Gaps In The Fossil Record

A Cambridge-led study links the spread of microbial collagenases near the Ediacaran-Cambrian boundary to fewer soft-bodied fossils.

Mapping The Gaps In NASA’s Return To The Moon, Featuring Richard Spolzino

NASA engineer Richard Spolzino describes how documented data gaps are informing lunar research, instrument reviews and coordination with mission partners.